Mark

Context

​

Mark had been in his role for over 5 years and was known for his strong technical expertise and dedication to operational efficiency. However, recently, he received feedback that his leadership style was becoming a bottleneck for his team. His employees noted that while Mark was highly competent, he often struggled with providing clear direction, offering timely feedback, and adapting to the evolving needs of the team. In addition, there were occasional reports of low morale within his department due to communication gaps.

​

Mark’s company had implemented a leadership development program and, as part of this program, he was asked to undergo both a 360-degree feedback review and a Big Five Personality Test to gain insights into his leadership style. The goal was to identify key areas for improvement and develop a plan for enhancing his leadership effectiveness.

​

360-Degree Feedback Results

​

The 360-degree feedback was gathered from a variety of sources: Mark’s direct reports, peers in other departments, and his manager. The feedback was organized into several key themes:

• Strengths:

  • Technical Expertise: Mark’s deep understanding of the operations was praised. He was seen as reliable, knowledgeable, and skilled at problem-solving.

  • Work Ethic: He was known for his commitment to excellence, often going above and beyond to ensure tasks were completed on time.

• Development Areas:

  • Communication: Mark was often perceived as not providing enough context or direction in his communications. Employees felt uncertain about expectations, and feedback was given infrequently or in a non-constructive manner.

  • Delegation: Several employees mentioned that Mark tended to micromanage, which caused frustration and stifled their sense of ownership and initiative.

  • Emotional Intelligence: There were concerns about Mark’s emotional awareness. While he was calm under pressure, some found him distant or unapproachable, especially when it came to dealing with team dynamics or conflict.

• Overall Impression:

  • His leadership style was effective in crisis situations, but lacked the engagement and motivation that was needed for long-term team development and growth. There was a sense that Mark’s leadership was more transactional than transformational.

 

Big Five Personality Test Results

​

Mark’s Big Five results highlighted the following:

1. Openness to Experience: Moderate

   • Mark scored moderate on openness, indicating he was open to new ideas, but preferred tried-and-true methods over experimentation. He showed interest in innovation when it had clear, practical applications, but resisted change when it wasn’t aligned with current processes.

2. Conscientiousness: High

   • Mark scored highly in conscientiousness, indicating that he was highly organized, goal-driven, and reliable. He had a strong focus on efficiency, deadlines, and delivering results.

3. Extraversion: Low

   • Mark scored low in extraversion, suggesting he was introverted and preferred working independently or in smaller groups. He didn’t seek the spotlight and often avoided social interactions that felt unnecessary or overly personal.

4. Agreeableness: Moderate

   • Mark’s agreeableness score was moderate, suggesting that he was generally cooperative but could be firm or assertive when necessary. He was more task-focused and less oriented toward building deep interpersonal relationships with his team.

5. Neuroticism (Emotional Stability): Moderate

   • Mark had a moderate score for neuroticism, which meant he was relatively calm in stressful situations but could sometimes experience self-doubt or frustration in challenging interpersonal dynamics.

 

Coaching Focus Areas

​

Based on the results from the 360-degree feedback and the Big Five Personality Test, the coaching sessions were designed to focus on the following areas:

​

1. Enhancing Communication and Clarity

• Challenge: Mark’s communication style was seen as unclear and infrequent. His technical expertise sometimes overshadowed the need for effective, accessible communication, especially with non-technical team members.

• Coaching Approach:

  • Mark was encouraged to focus on clarity and context when delivering messages. He learned to ask for feedback from his team about whether they fully understood his expectations and messages.

  • Regular one-on-one meetings with direct reports were introduced, where Mark was encouraged to give more frequent, constructive feedback.

  • He was also coached to use active listening techniques to foster better two-way communication and ensure that employees felt heard and valued.

• Outcome: Mark became more intentional about providing clear direction and regularly checking in with his team. His direct reports reported a noticeable improvement in communication, with clearer expectations and better alignment on goals.

2. Improving Delegation and Trusting the Team

• Challenge: Mark’s high conscientiousness and desire for efficiency led him to micromanage, which caused frustration among his team. Employees felt their ability to take ownership was being stifled.

• Coaching Approach:

  • Mark was coached on the importance of empowering his team by delegating tasks with clear guidelines but allowing team members the autonomy to execute their responsibilities.

  • He was encouraged to set clear outcomes for delegated tasks and trust his team to find the best ways to achieve them, rather than dictating the steps.

  • We discussed the concept of situational leadership, where Mark would assess the skill levels and confidence of his team members before determining how much direction or autonomy to provide.

• Outcome: After practicing delegation techniques, Mark noticed that his team became more motivated and engaged. Employees took more initiative and developed their problem-solving skills. Mark also felt more confident in his leadership, knowing that he didn’t need to micromanage to ensure success.

3. Strengthening Emotional Intelligence and Approachability

• Challenge: Mark’s moderate agreeableness and low extraversion made him seem distant or unapproachable. He was calm under pressure but struggled to connect with his team on an emotional level, which created challenges in conflict resolution and team cohesion.

• Coaching Approach:

  • Mark worked on enhancing his emotional intelligence (EI), particularly in areas such as empathy and self-awareness. He was encouraged to ask questions that showed interest in his team members’ perspectives, both professionally and personally.

  • To improve approachability, Mark committed to taking a more open, empathetic stance during team interactions, engaging in casual conversations and asking for feedback on how he could support his team better.

  • He practiced conflict resolution techniques, learning how to address interpersonal issues quickly and diplomatically.

• Outcome: Over time, Mark’s approachability improved. His team felt more comfortable coming to him with concerns or ideas, and he became more attuned to their emotional needs. This fostered a more supportive and cohesive team environment.

 

Results and Impact

​

After six months of coaching, the following outcomes were observed:

• Improved Communication: Mark’s communication became clearer and more consistent. His team reported feeling more aligned with his expectations, and there was a noticeable improvement in team morale.

• Effective Delegation: Mark learned to delegate more effectively, which empowered his team and led to increased ownership of projects. This shift also allowed Mark to focus on more strategic tasks.

• Stronger Emotional Connections: Mark’s emotional intelligence improved, and he became more approachable. He was better able to navigate team dynamics and resolve conflicts swiftly.

• Feedback from Peers: Feedback from Mark’s peers and direct reports showed a marked improvement in his leadership effectiveness. They reported that he was now more engaging, approachable, and balanced in his approach to managing the team.

 

Mark's manager also noted an improvement in team performance, as the department’s efficiency increased, and there was less friction among team members. Additionally, Mark’s ability to provide constructive feedback and support his team’s professional growth became a significant asset to the organization.

​

Conclusion

​

Combining a 360-degree feedback review with a Big Five Personality Test provides  valuable insights for leadership development. Mark’s results showed that while he had many strengths, there were clear areas for growth in communication, delegation, and emotional intelligence. Via a tailored coaching approach, Mark was able to refine his leadership style, resulting in improved team dynamics, better communication, and enhanced team performance. By addressing these development areas, Mark became a more effective leader and fostered a more positive and productive environment for his team.